Current Affairs Analysis
Polycrises, democracy, and disputes over the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52451/prgr6s03Keywords:
Polycrisis, Democracy, Neoliberal capitalism, Climate crisis, Ecosocial justice, Geopolitics, Big Techs, Solidarity economy, Catholic Church, Political participationAbstract
The interview with sociologist and educator Eduardo Brasileiro analyzes the contemporary context through the notion of “polycrisis,” characterized by the interconnection of political, economic, social, environmental, and cultural crises. The author identifies, at the root of this scenario, the crisis of neoliberal and financialized capitalism, associated with the precarization of life, rising inequalities, and the erosion of democratic institutions. It also highlights a crisis of meaning and of the future, marked by social fragmentation, disinformation, and difficulties in constructing shared horizons, especially among youth.
At the international level, the interview points to a transition from a global order hegemonized by the United States to a multipolar scenario, with the strengthening of actors such as China, the BRICS, and countries of the Global South. This process intensifies geopolitical disputes while also revealing the limitations of multilateral institutions. The rise of far-right sectors and the role of Big Techs are analyzed as factors that impact democracy, whether through polarization, disinformation, or the algorithmic capture of public debate.
The reflection also addresses the notion of “ecosocial dystopia,” which highlights the unsustainability of the current development model in the face of the climate crisis and socio-environmental inequalities. In this context, alternatives such as the popular and solidarity economy, buen vivir, and ecosocial justice are presented. In the Brazilian context, the third Lula administration is understood as a period of institutional reconstruction, albeit marked by structural limitations and political challenges.
Finally, the interview emphasizes the role of the Catholic Church in public life, particularly in promoting social justice, with an emphasis on housing as a fundamental right, and proposes key elements for a new democratic and popular cycle, based on citizen participation, an economy at the service of life, sustainability, and critical political education.
Downloads
References
JABBOUR, Elias e, GABRIELE, Alberto. China: o socialismo do século XXI. São Paulo - SP: Boitempo, 2021.
LAZZARATO, Maurizio. O governo do homem endividado. São Paulo: N-1 edições, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.jur.puc-rio.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/MAURIZIO-LAZZARATO-O-governo-do-homem-endividado-Cap-2.pdf Acesso em 28.jul.2025.
MOORE, Jason W. (org). Antropoceno ou Capitaloceno?: natureza, história e a crise do capitalismo. São Paulo: Elefante, 2022.
SVAMPA, Maristella. As fronteiras do neoextrativismo na América Latina: conflitos socioambientais, giro ecoterritorial e novas dependências. Tradução de Lígia Azevedo. São Paulo: Elefante, 2019.
VATICANO. Discurso do Papa Francisco aos representantes pontifícios. Disponível em: <https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/pt/speeches/2022/september/documents/20220908-rappresentanti-pontifici.html>. Acesso em: abr. 2026
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ivanir Rodighero

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos textos são mantidos pelos autores, no qual concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação. Como a revista é de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias em aplicações educacionais e não comerciais.